Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. Explain your answer, using the evidence of Sources V, W and X and your own knowledge of the issues related to this controversy. Therefore one can argue how various interpretations could have exaggerated the idea that the Nazi state was chaotic; nonetheless this does not discredit the view in sources X and V that the Nazi state did in fact lack coherence in the years to
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. However, whether Hitler was a masterful schemer who encouraged administrative chaos to enhance his own power, or a weak dictator, and at best a good opportunist is debatable.
However, it could be argued that the traditionalist interpretation of Hitler was nothing more than an myth, enhanced by propaganda, which served to reinforce the German tradition of an authoritarian leadership. He offered his subordinates an overall vision of his aims, and left the interpretation and implementation of those aims to them.
Hitler had effectively reduced his role to that of a figurehead, where by he took no active role in administrative tasks. This left Hitler in a position of ignorance, which in turn made him increasingly dependant upon his subordinates to keep him informed critical issues concerning Germany and her people.
The fact that Hitler had to take prompting from others to achieve his own aims indicates he was a weak dictator. Moreover, it could be said that his lack of participation in the conventional routines of government placed him in a position of strength, not weakness, since by remaining aloof he protected himself from criticism.
Thus, he presided over a chaotic system with no clear cut channels of responsibility he could take credit for the most successful policies, whilst separating himself from those policies which proved to be less popular. In this respect, Hitler was a strong dictator in a position of power, where by he had others to implement his will and at the same time blame for the failures within this own government.
On the other hand, it could be said, that if Hitler was weak in any respect, it was not due to his incompetence, but sheer laziness. It could be argued that, the chaotic system did not work as a result of being guided by one ideology, simply because there was no clear sense of it.
Thus creating internal conflict within families, instead of extinguishing them. Moreover, Hitler claimed to believe that the group was more important than the individual, yet he had establish a political system that encouraged officials to put themselves before there own party.
This in turn served to limit the efficiency of the Government, since officials were too busy competing amongst themselves to concentrate on achieving the aims of the party. These qualities in Hitler were reflected in his ideology. Instead of using his initiative to come up with a more original ideology he simply promoted more extreme explicit versions of already existing views that had already be aspect amongst the general population well before the Nazi era.
This suggests that the role of ideology, in respect to the success of the chaotic system, should not be exaggerated. This in turn makes the validity of this statement questionable. His laziness made him inclined to promote a more traditional form of ideology, which proved to be more successful than the revolutionary policies of Nazism.
He had gone for a tradition approach towards ideology as a means by which to appease both the elite and industrialists who he depended upon to maintain his power. This suggests that in truth the elite influenced policies, and therefore ultimate power laid with the Junkers, not Hitler.
On the other hand, it could be argued that, although the Elite may have influenced Nazi policies more than Hitler did, over time his popularity enable him to reduce the power on the Elite. This in turn gave him more freedom and put him in an, increasingly, powerful position.
In this respect the validity of the statement is reinforced. This in turn serves to justify his lack of involvement politically, whilst at the same time dismissing the notion that his lack of involvement politically made him a weak leader.
Nazi Germany is the common English name for Germany between and , when Adolf Hitler and his Nazi Party (NSDAP) controlled the country through a dictatorship. Under Hitler's rule, Germany was transformed into a totalitarian state that controlled nearly all . The nazi state also contained powerful elite factions – the old military, the Nazi party, the business elites, the SS and SA. Martin Brozat ermed this a ‘polycratic power structure’ – overlaid by Hitler’s unrestrained personal charismatic power. The Nazi Government Essay Sample “Although Nazi government was confused and chaotic, it worked because it was guided by one ideology and because Hitler always retained ultimate control.” Examine the validity of this statement.
No matter who you were within the party or state, you were answerable to Hitler. This in itself indicates his ultimate power.
Hitler was seen above both the party and the very law itself. Take, for example, the Euthanasia programme of Although Hitler had written a note authorising the Euthanasia program, technically it was illegal because it had not been authorised in a law.
It could be argued that he at least possessed the appearance of a strong dictator. However, on the other hand it could be argued, that his true weakness laid not in the way others perceived him but the way he perceived himself. On the other had his could be argued that.
Hitler was a weak dictator who was not fully in control. Rather than implementing a plan, worked out years prior to his arrival into power, Hitler responded to the circumstances in which he found himself. The Nazi government evolved into a system of chaos not because he wanted it to be sobut because he did not have the power to streamline the system.
Moreover, it could be said, that whether the chaotic system was intentional all not is irrelevant, since either was he was position that worked towards his advantage.The nazi state also contained powerful elite factions – the old military, the Nazi party, the business elites, the SS and SA.
Martin Brozat ermed this a ‘polycratic power structure’ – overlaid by Hitler’s unrestrained personal charismatic power. The Nazi Party lacked in organisation and unity which would be expected of a totalitarian state, this is not to say that Nazi Germany did not contain numerous aspects that would support the idea that in fact it was a totalitarian society.
Free Essay: The Totalitarian Aspects of Nazi Germany The government of Nazi Germany was a fascist, totalitarian state. They ruled in Germany ever since. The Nazi Government Essay Sample “Although Nazi government was confused and chaotic, it worked because it was guided by one ideology and because Hitler always retained ultimate control.” Examine the validity of this statement.
The Government of Nazi Germany was a dictatorship run according to the Führerprinzip. As the successor to the government of the Weimar Republic, it inherited the government structure and institutions of the previous state.
Characteristics of The Nazi State / Essay on German Ideology. The specificity (may call a negative point) of Nazi government was “Adolf Hitler”.
The Nazi state was governed by Adolf Hitler and he was the only decision maker at that time.